diff --git a/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md b/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4e49640 --- /dev/null +++ b/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-apply.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ + +**Guardrails** +- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required. +- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome. +- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications. + +**Steps** +Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one. +1. Read `changes//proposal.md`, `design.md` (if present), and `tasks.md` to confirm scope and acceptance criteria. +2. Work through tasks sequentially, keeping edits minimal and focused on the requested change. +3. Confirm completion before updating statuses—make sure every item in `tasks.md` is finished. +4. Update the checklist after all work is done so each task is marked `- [x]` and reflects reality. +5. Reference `openspec list` or `openspec show ` when additional context is required. + +**Reference** +- Use `openspec show --json --deltas-only` if you need additional context from the proposal while implementing. + diff --git a/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md b/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..34795ca --- /dev/null +++ b/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-archive.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ + +**Guardrails** +- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required. +- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome. +- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications. + +**Steps** +1. Determine the change ID to archive: + - If this prompt already includes a specific change ID (for example inside a `` block populated by slash-command arguments), use that value after trimming whitespace. + - If the conversation references a change loosely (for example by title or summary), run `openspec list` to surface likely IDs, share the relevant candidates, and confirm which one the user intends. + - Otherwise, review the conversation, run `openspec list`, and ask the user which change to archive; wait for a confirmed change ID before proceeding. + - If you still cannot identify a single change ID, stop and tell the user you cannot archive anything yet. +2. Validate the change ID by running `openspec list` (or `openspec show `) and stop if the change is missing, already archived, or otherwise not ready to archive. +3. Run `openspec archive --yes` so the CLI moves the change and applies spec updates without prompts (use `--skip-specs` only for tooling-only work). +4. Review the command output to confirm the target specs were updated and the change landed in `changes/archive/`. +5. Validate with `openspec validate --strict` and inspect with `openspec show ` if anything looks off. + +**Reference** +- Use `openspec list` to confirm change IDs before archiving. +- Inspect refreshed specs with `openspec list --specs` and address any validation issues before handing off. + diff --git a/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md b/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..15947b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/.kilocode/workflows/openspec-proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ + +**Guardrails** +- Favor straightforward, minimal implementations first and add complexity only when it is requested or clearly required. +- Keep changes tightly scoped to the requested outcome. +- Refer to `openspec/AGENTS.md` (located inside the `openspec/` directory—run `ls openspec` or `openspec update` if you don't see it) if you need additional OpenSpec conventions or clarifications. +- Identify any vague or ambiguous details and ask the necessary follow-up questions before editing files. +- Do not write any code during the proposal stage. Only create design documents (proposal.md, tasks.md, design.md, and spec deltas). Implementation happens in the apply stage after approval. + +**Steps** +1. Review `openspec/project.md`, run `openspec list` and `openspec list --specs`, and inspect related code or docs (e.g., via `rg`/`ls`) to ground the proposal in current behaviour; note any gaps that require clarification. +2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, and `design.md` (when needed) under `openspec/changes//`. +3. Map the change into concrete capabilities or requirements, breaking multi-scope efforts into distinct spec deltas with clear relationships and sequencing. +4. Capture architectural reasoning in `design.md` when the solution spans multiple systems, introduces new patterns, or demands trade-off discussion before committing to specs. +5. Draft spec deltas in `changes//specs//spec.md` (one folder per capability) using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement and cross-reference related capabilities when relevant. +6. Draft `tasks.md` as an ordered list of small, verifiable work items that deliver user-visible progress, include validation (tests, tooling), and highlight dependencies or parallelizable work. +7. Validate with `openspec validate --strict` and resolve every issue before sharing the proposal. + +**Reference** +- Use `openspec show --json --deltas-only` or `openspec show --type spec` to inspect details when validation fails. +- Search existing requirements with `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs` before writing new ones. +- Explore the codebase with `rg `, `ls`, or direct file reads so proposals align with current implementation realities. + diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0669699 --- /dev/null +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ + +# OpenSpec Instructions + +These instructions are for AI assistants working in this project. + +Always open `@/openspec/AGENTS.md` when the request: +- Mentions planning or proposals (words like proposal, spec, change, plan) +- Introduces new capabilities, breaking changes, architecture shifts, or big performance/security work +- Sounds ambiguous and you need the authoritative spec before coding + +Use `@/openspec/AGENTS.md` to learn: +- How to create and apply change proposals +- Spec format and conventions +- Project structure and guidelines + +Keep this managed block so 'openspec update' can refresh the instructions. + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/openspec/AGENTS.md b/openspec/AGENTS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..96ab0bb --- /dev/null +++ b/openspec/AGENTS.md @@ -0,0 +1,456 @@ +# OpenSpec Instructions + +Instructions for AI coding assistants using OpenSpec for spec-driven development. + +## TL;DR Quick Checklist + +- Search existing work: `openspec spec list --long`, `openspec list` (use `rg` only for full-text search) +- Decide scope: new capability vs modify existing capability +- Pick a unique `change-id`: kebab-case, verb-led (`add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-`) +- Scaffold: `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, `design.md` (only if needed), and delta specs per affected capability +- Write deltas: use `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED|RENAMED Requirements`; include at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement +- Validate: `openspec validate [change-id] --strict` and fix issues +- Request approval: Do not start implementation until proposal is approved + +## Three-Stage Workflow + +### Stage 1: Creating Changes +Create proposal when you need to: +- Add features or functionality +- Make breaking changes (API, schema) +- Change architecture or patterns +- Optimize performance (changes behavior) +- Update security patterns + +Triggers (examples): +- "Help me create a change proposal" +- "Help me plan a change" +- "Help me create a proposal" +- "I want to create a spec proposal" +- "I want to create a spec" + +Loose matching guidance: +- Contains one of: `proposal`, `change`, `spec` +- With one of: `create`, `plan`, `make`, `start`, `help` + +Skip proposal for: +- Bug fixes (restore intended behavior) +- Typos, formatting, comments +- Dependency updates (non-breaking) +- Configuration changes +- Tests for existing behavior + +**Workflow** +1. Review `openspec/project.md`, `openspec list`, and `openspec list --specs` to understand current context. +2. Choose a unique verb-led `change-id` and scaffold `proposal.md`, `tasks.md`, optional `design.md`, and spec deltas under `openspec/changes//`. +3. Draft spec deltas using `## ADDED|MODIFIED|REMOVED Requirements` with at least one `#### Scenario:` per requirement. +4. Run `openspec validate --strict` and resolve any issues before sharing the proposal. + +### Stage 2: Implementing Changes +Track these steps as TODOs and complete them one by one. +1. **Read proposal.md** - Understand what's being built +2. **Read design.md** (if exists) - Review technical decisions +3. **Read tasks.md** - Get implementation checklist +4. **Implement tasks sequentially** - Complete in order +5. **Confirm completion** - Ensure every item in `tasks.md` is finished before updating statuses +6. **Update checklist** - After all work is done, set every task to `- [x]` so the list reflects reality +7. **Approval gate** - Do not start implementation until the proposal is reviewed and approved + +### Stage 3: Archiving Changes +After deployment, create separate PR to: +- Move `changes/[name]/` → `changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-[name]/` +- Update `specs/` if capabilities changed +- Use `openspec archive --skip-specs --yes` for tooling-only changes (always pass the change ID explicitly) +- Run `openspec validate --strict` to confirm the archived change passes checks + +## Before Any Task + +**Context Checklist:** +- [ ] Read relevant specs in `specs/[capability]/spec.md` +- [ ] Check pending changes in `changes/` for conflicts +- [ ] Read `openspec/project.md` for conventions +- [ ] Run `openspec list` to see active changes +- [ ] Run `openspec list --specs` to see existing capabilities + +**Before Creating Specs:** +- Always check if capability already exists +- Prefer modifying existing specs over creating duplicates +- Use `openspec show [spec]` to review current state +- If request is ambiguous, ask 1–2 clarifying questions before scaffolding + +### Search Guidance +- Enumerate specs: `openspec spec list --long` (or `--json` for scripts) +- Enumerate changes: `openspec list` (or `openspec change list --json` - deprecated but available) +- Show details: + - Spec: `openspec show --type spec` (use `--json` for filters) + - Change: `openspec show --json --deltas-only` +- Full-text search (use ripgrep): `rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs` + +## Quick Start + +### CLI Commands + +```bash +# Essential commands +openspec list # List active changes +openspec list --specs # List specifications +openspec show [item] # Display change or spec +openspec validate [item] # Validate changes or specs +openspec archive [--yes|-y] # Archive after deployment (add --yes for non-interactive runs) + +# Project management +openspec init [path] # Initialize OpenSpec +openspec update [path] # Update instruction files + +# Interactive mode +openspec show # Prompts for selection +openspec validate # Bulk validation mode + +# Debugging +openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only +openspec validate [change] --strict +``` + +### Command Flags + +- `--json` - Machine-readable output +- `--type change|spec` - Disambiguate items +- `--strict` - Comprehensive validation +- `--no-interactive` - Disable prompts +- `--skip-specs` - Archive without spec updates +- `--yes`/`-y` - Skip confirmation prompts (non-interactive archive) + +## Directory Structure + +``` +openspec/ +├── project.md # Project conventions +├── specs/ # Current truth - what IS built +│ └── [capability]/ # Single focused capability +│ ├── spec.md # Requirements and scenarios +│ └── design.md # Technical patterns +├── changes/ # Proposals - what SHOULD change +│ ├── [change-name]/ +│ │ ├── proposal.md # Why, what, impact +│ │ ├── tasks.md # Implementation checklist +│ │ ├── design.md # Technical decisions (optional; see criteria) +│ │ └── specs/ # Delta changes +│ │ └── [capability]/ +│ │ └── spec.md # ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED +│ └── archive/ # Completed changes +``` + +## Creating Change Proposals + +### Decision Tree + +``` +New request? +├─ Bug fix restoring spec behavior? → Fix directly +├─ Typo/format/comment? → Fix directly +├─ New feature/capability? → Create proposal +├─ Breaking change? → Create proposal +├─ Architecture change? → Create proposal +└─ Unclear? → Create proposal (safer) +``` + +### Proposal Structure + +1. **Create directory:** `changes/[change-id]/` (kebab-case, verb-led, unique) + +2. **Write proposal.md:** +```markdown +# Change: [Brief description of change] + +## Why +[1-2 sentences on problem/opportunity] + +## What Changes +- [Bullet list of changes] +- [Mark breaking changes with **BREAKING**] + +## Impact +- Affected specs: [list capabilities] +- Affected code: [key files/systems] +``` + +3. **Create spec deltas:** `specs/[capability]/spec.md` +```markdown +## ADDED Requirements +### Requirement: New Feature +The system SHALL provide... + +#### Scenario: Success case +- **WHEN** user performs action +- **THEN** expected result + +## MODIFIED Requirements +### Requirement: Existing Feature +[Complete modified requirement] + +## REMOVED Requirements +### Requirement: Old Feature +**Reason**: [Why removing] +**Migration**: [How to handle] +``` +If multiple capabilities are affected, create multiple delta files under `changes/[change-id]/specs//spec.md`—one per capability. + +4. **Create tasks.md:** +```markdown +## 1. Implementation +- [ ] 1.1 Create database schema +- [ ] 1.2 Implement API endpoint +- [ ] 1.3 Add frontend component +- [ ] 1.4 Write tests +``` + +5. **Create design.md when needed:** +Create `design.md` if any of the following apply; otherwise omit it: +- Cross-cutting change (multiple services/modules) or a new architectural pattern +- New external dependency or significant data model changes +- Security, performance, or migration complexity +- Ambiguity that benefits from technical decisions before coding + +Minimal `design.md` skeleton: +```markdown +## Context +[Background, constraints, stakeholders] + +## Goals / Non-Goals +- Goals: [...] +- Non-Goals: [...] + +## Decisions +- Decision: [What and why] +- Alternatives considered: [Options + rationale] + +## Risks / Trade-offs +- [Risk] → Mitigation + +## Migration Plan +[Steps, rollback] + +## Open Questions +- [...] +``` + +## Spec File Format + +### Critical: Scenario Formatting + +**CORRECT** (use #### headers): +```markdown +#### Scenario: User login success +- **WHEN** valid credentials provided +- **THEN** return JWT token +``` + +**WRONG** (don't use bullets or bold): +```markdown +- **Scenario: User login** ❌ +**Scenario**: User login ❌ +### Scenario: User login ❌ +``` + +Every requirement MUST have at least one scenario. + +### Requirement Wording +- Use SHALL/MUST for normative requirements (avoid should/may unless intentionally non-normative) + +### Delta Operations + +- `## ADDED Requirements` - New capabilities +- `## MODIFIED Requirements` - Changed behavior +- `## REMOVED Requirements` - Deprecated features +- `## RENAMED Requirements` - Name changes + +Headers matched with `trim(header)` - whitespace ignored. + +#### When to use ADDED vs MODIFIED +- ADDED: Introduces a new capability or sub-capability that can stand alone as a requirement. Prefer ADDED when the change is orthogonal (e.g., adding "Slash Command Configuration") rather than altering the semantics of an existing requirement. +- MODIFIED: Changes the behavior, scope, or acceptance criteria of an existing requirement. Always paste the full, updated requirement content (header + all scenarios). The archiver will replace the entire requirement with what you provide here; partial deltas will drop previous details. +- RENAMED: Use when only the name changes. If you also change behavior, use RENAMED (name) plus MODIFIED (content) referencing the new name. + +Common pitfall: Using MODIFIED to add a new concern without including the previous text. This causes loss of detail at archive time. If you aren’t explicitly changing the existing requirement, add a new requirement under ADDED instead. + +Authoring a MODIFIED requirement correctly: +1) Locate the existing requirement in `openspec/specs//spec.md`. +2) Copy the entire requirement block (from `### Requirement: ...` through its scenarios). +3) Paste it under `## MODIFIED Requirements` and edit to reflect the new behavior. +4) Ensure the header text matches exactly (whitespace-insensitive) and keep at least one `#### Scenario:`. + +Example for RENAMED: +```markdown +## RENAMED Requirements +- FROM: `### Requirement: Login` +- TO: `### Requirement: User Authentication` +``` + +## Troubleshooting + +### Common Errors + +**"Change must have at least one delta"** +- Check `changes/[name]/specs/` exists with .md files +- Verify files have operation prefixes (## ADDED Requirements) + +**"Requirement must have at least one scenario"** +- Check scenarios use `#### Scenario:` format (4 hashtags) +- Don't use bullet points or bold for scenario headers + +**Silent scenario parsing failures** +- Exact format required: `#### Scenario: Name` +- Debug with: `openspec show [change] --json --deltas-only` + +### Validation Tips + +```bash +# Always use strict mode for comprehensive checks +openspec validate [change] --strict + +# Debug delta parsing +openspec show [change] --json | jq '.deltas' + +# Check specific requirement +openspec show [spec] --json -r 1 +``` + +## Happy Path Script + +```bash +# 1) Explore current state +openspec spec list --long +openspec list +# Optional full-text search: +# rg -n "Requirement:|Scenario:" openspec/specs +# rg -n "^#|Requirement:" openspec/changes + +# 2) Choose change id and scaffold +CHANGE=add-two-factor-auth +mkdir -p openspec/changes/$CHANGE/{specs/auth} +printf "## Why\n...\n\n## What Changes\n- ...\n\n## Impact\n- ...\n" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/proposal.md +printf "## 1. Implementation\n- [ ] 1.1 ...\n" > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/tasks.md + +# 3) Add deltas (example) +cat > openspec/changes/$CHANGE/specs/auth/spec.md << 'EOF' +## ADDED Requirements +### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication +Users MUST provide a second factor during login. + +#### Scenario: OTP required +- **WHEN** valid credentials are provided +- **THEN** an OTP challenge is required +EOF + +# 4) Validate +openspec validate $CHANGE --strict +``` + +## Multi-Capability Example + +``` +openspec/changes/add-2fa-notify/ +├── proposal.md +├── tasks.md +└── specs/ + ├── auth/ + │ └── spec.md # ADDED: Two-Factor Authentication + └── notifications/ + └── spec.md # ADDED: OTP email notification +``` + +auth/spec.md +```markdown +## ADDED Requirements +### Requirement: Two-Factor Authentication +... +``` + +notifications/spec.md +```markdown +## ADDED Requirements +### Requirement: OTP Email Notification +... +``` + +## Best Practices + +### Simplicity First +- Default to <100 lines of new code +- Single-file implementations until proven insufficient +- Avoid frameworks without clear justification +- Choose boring, proven patterns + +### Complexity Triggers +Only add complexity with: +- Performance data showing current solution too slow +- Concrete scale requirements (>1000 users, >100MB data) +- Multiple proven use cases requiring abstraction + +### Clear References +- Use `file.ts:42` format for code locations +- Reference specs as `specs/auth/spec.md` +- Link related changes and PRs + +### Capability Naming +- Use verb-noun: `user-auth`, `payment-capture` +- Single purpose per capability +- 10-minute understandability rule +- Split if description needs "AND" + +### Change ID Naming +- Use kebab-case, short and descriptive: `add-two-factor-auth` +- Prefer verb-led prefixes: `add-`, `update-`, `remove-`, `refactor-` +- Ensure uniqueness; if taken, append `-2`, `-3`, etc. + +## Tool Selection Guide + +| Task | Tool | Why | +|------|------|-----| +| Find files by pattern | Glob | Fast pattern matching | +| Search code content | Grep | Optimized regex search | +| Read specific files | Read | Direct file access | +| Explore unknown scope | Task | Multi-step investigation | + +## Error Recovery + +### Change Conflicts +1. Run `openspec list` to see active changes +2. Check for overlapping specs +3. Coordinate with change owners +4. Consider combining proposals + +### Validation Failures +1. Run with `--strict` flag +2. Check JSON output for details +3. Verify spec file format +4. Ensure scenarios properly formatted + +### Missing Context +1. Read project.md first +2. Check related specs +3. Review recent archives +4. Ask for clarification + +## Quick Reference + +### Stage Indicators +- `changes/` - Proposed, not yet built +- `specs/` - Built and deployed +- `archive/` - Completed changes + +### File Purposes +- `proposal.md` - Why and what +- `tasks.md` - Implementation steps +- `design.md` - Technical decisions +- `spec.md` - Requirements and behavior + +### CLI Essentials +```bash +openspec list # What's in progress? +openspec show [item] # View details +openspec validate --strict # Is it correct? +openspec archive [--yes|-y] # Mark complete (add --yes for automation) +``` + +Remember: Specs are truth. Changes are proposals. Keep them in sync. diff --git a/openspec/project.md b/openspec/project.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..991d783 --- /dev/null +++ b/openspec/project.md @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ +# Project Context + +## Purpose + +这是一个基于 unibest 模板开发的跨平台电商应用系统,包含三个主要端: + +1. **用户端**(C端):提供商品浏览、购物车、订单管理、会员服务、金融服务等功能 +2. **商家端**(B端):提供商品管理、订单处理、财务管理、贷款协助、店铺设置等功能 +3. **银行端**(B端):提供客户管理、贷款审核、交易记录、提现管理等功能 + +项目支持多平台部署,包括 H5、iOS、Android 以及多个小程序平台(微信、支付宝、百度、字节、快手、QQ、钉钉、小红书等)。 + +## Tech Stack + +### 核心框架 +- **uni-app** 3.0.0 - 跨平台开发框架 +- **Vue 3** 3.4.21 - 前端框架 +- **TypeScript** 5.8.0 - 类型系统 +- **Vite** 5.2.8 - 构建工具 + +### UI 组件库 +- **wot-design-uni** - UI 组件库 +- **UnoCSS** 66.0.0 - 原子化 CSS 框架 +- **z-paging** 2.8.7 - 分页组件 + +### 状态管理与路由 +- **Pinia** 2.0.36 - 状态管理 +- **pinia-plugin-persistedstate** 3.2.1 - 状态持久化 +- **vue-router** 4.5.1 - 路由管理 +- **vue-i18n** 9.1.9 - 国际化 + +### HTTP 请求库(支持多种选择) +- **alova** 3.3.3 - 请求库(推荐) +- **简单封装的 http** - 轻量级请求方案 +- **vue-query** - 查询状态管理(用于自动生成接口) + +### 工具库 +- **dayjs** 1.11.10 - 日期处理 +- **js-cookie** 3.0.5 - Cookie 操作 + +### 开发工具 +- **pnpm** 10.10.0 - 包管理器 +- **ESLint** 9.31.0 - 代码检查 +- **Husky** 9.1.7 - Git hooks +- **commitlint** 19.8.1 - 提交信息规范 + +### Node.js 环境 +- **Node.js** >= 20 +- **pnpm** >= 9 + +## Project Conventions + +### Code Style + +#### 命名约定 +- **文件命名**:使用 kebab-case(如 `cart-item.vue`) +- **组件命名**:使用 PascalCase(如 `CartItem.vue`) +- **变量/函数命名**:使用 camelCase(如 `getCartList`) +- **常量命名**:使用 UPPER_SNAKE_CASE(如 `API_BASE_URL`) + +#### 代码格式化 +- 使用 `@uni-helper/eslint-config` 作为 ESLint 配置 +- 支持 CSS、LESS、SCSS、HTML 的自动格式化 +- Vue SFC 块顺序:`[script, template]` → `style` + +#### 路径别名 +- `@/*` → `./src/*` +- `@img/*` → `./src/static/images/*` + +#### 自动导入 +- Vue 和 uni-app API 自动导入 +- `src/hooks` 目录下的 hooks 自动导入 +- 组件自动导入(支持递归扫描子目录) + +### Architecture Patterns + +#### 目录结构 +``` +src/ +├── api/ # API 接口定义 +├── components/ # 公共组件 +├── hooks/ # 组合式函数 +├── http/ # HTTP 请求封装 +├── layouts/ # 布局组件 +├── mock/ # Mock 数据 +├── pages/ # 用户端页面 +├── pagesMerchant/# 商家端页面 +├── pagesBank/ # 银行端页面 +├── router/ # 路由配置 +├── service/ # 自动生成的服务接口 +├── static/ # 静态资源 +└── typings/ # 类型定义 +``` + +#### 路由策略 +- **约定式路由**:基于文件系统自动生成路由 +- **Layout 布局**:支持多布局系统 +- **分包优化**:使用 `@uni-ku/bundle-optimizer` 进行分包优化 +- **异步导入**:支持模块和组件的异步跨包引用 + +#### 登录策略 +支持两种登录策略(通过 `DEFAULT_NO_NEED_LOGIN` 配置): + +1. **默认无需登录策略**(DEFAULT_NO_NEED_LOGIN) + - 进入任何页面都不需要登录 + - 只有黑名单中的页面需要登录 + - 适用于大部分 2C 应用(如美团、抖音) + +2. **默认需要登录策略**(DEFAULT_NEED_LOGIN) + - 进入任何页面都需要登录 + - 只有白名单中的页面不需要登录 + - 适用于 2B 和后台管理类应用 + +#### 请求拦截 +- 统一的请求拦截器(`src/http/interceptor.ts`) +- 支持登录拦截 +- 支持请求/响应错误处理 + +### Testing Strategy + +当前项目未配置自动化测试框架。建议: +- 使用 Vitest 进行单元测试 +- 使用 @vue/test-utils 进行组件测试 +- 使用 Playwright 进行端到端测试 + +### Git Workflow + +#### 分支策略 +- `main` / `base` - 主分支 +- `base-i18n` - 国际化分支 +- `base-login` - 登录功能分支 +- `base-login-i18n` - 登录+国际化分支 + +#### 提交规范 +使用 Conventional Commits 规范: +- `feat:` - 新功能 +- `fix:` - 修复 bug +- `docs:` - 文档更新 +- `style:` - 代码格式调整 +- `refactor:` - 重构 +- `test:` - 测试相关 +- `chore:` - 构建/工具相关 + +#### Git Hooks +- 使用 Husky 管理 Git hooks +- 使用 lint-staged 在提交前自动修复代码 + +## Domain Context + +### 业务领域 + +#### 用户端(C端) +- **商品模块**:商品列表、详情、分类、搜索 +- **购物车模块**:添加商品、数量调整、结算 +- **订单模块**:订单确认、订单列表、订单详情 +- **会员模块**:会员卡、会员权益 +- **金融模块**:信用额度、结算、核销、贷款申请 + +#### 商家端(B端) +- **仪表盘**:数据统计、概览 +- **商品管理**:商品列表、编辑 +- **订单管理**:订单列表、订单详情 +- **财务管理**:财务统计、结算、提现 +- **贷款协助**:协助用户申请贷款 +- **店铺设置**:店铺信息管理 + +#### 银行端(B端) +- **仪表盘**:数据统计 +- **客户管理**:客户列表、客户详情、交易记录、提现记录 +- **审核管理**:贷款审核列表、审核详情 + +### 关键概念 +- **多端适配**:同一套代码适配 H5、App、小程序 +- **角色权限**:用户、商家、银行三种角色 +- **金融服务**:信用额度、贷款申请、结算、核销 +- **会员体系**:会员卡、会员权益 + +## Important Constraints + +### 技术约束 +- **Node.js 版本**:必须 >= 20 +- **pnpm 版本**:必须 >= 9 +- **包管理器**:强制使用 pnpm(通过 `only-allow pnpm`) +- **TypeScript**:必须使用 TypeScript 开发 +- **平台限制**:不同 UI 框架支持的平台有所不同 + +### 业务约束 +- **多端兼容性**:需要确保在所有目标平台上正常运行 +- **性能要求**:分包优化、按需加载、减少包体积 +- **安全性**:登录拦截、请求加密、数据验证 + +### 开发约束 +- **代码规范**:必须通过 ESLint 检查 +- **提交规范**:必须符合 Conventional Commits 规范 +- **文件忽略**:自动生成的文件(如 `src/service/**`)不应提交 + +## External Dependencies + +### 平台依赖 +- **DCloudio** - uni-app 官方框架和工具链 +- **微信开发者工具** - 微信小程序开发调试 +- **HBuilderX** - App 平台打包(可选) + +### 第三方服务 +- **OpenAPI** - 用于自动生成 API 接口类型和代码 +- **Iconify** - 图标库(Carbon 图标集) + +### 构建依赖 +- **@uni-helper** - uni-app 辅助工具集 +- **@uni-ku** - uni-app 性能优化工具 +- **unplugin-auto-import** - 自动导入插件 + +### 开发依赖 +- **@dcloudio/types** - uni-app 类型定义 +- **miniprogram-api-typings** - 小程序 API 类型定义 +- **rollup-plugin-visualizer** - 打包分析工具